Drink sodden racist chavs including a Hindu got more than they bargained for when after hurling racist abuse outside an Islamic College in Bolton the College's Muslim students beat them up with cricket bats.
The hilarious ironic story gets even better because after receiving a hiding and spending time in hospital it was the racists who were given various court sentences. What almost made me fall of my chair with laughter was the Hindu bloke Bhavesh Patel (who got a fractured skull for his efforts) had his racist abuse towards presumably fellow brown people described by his brief as "out of character given his heritage".
LM should point out I do not condone violence particularly as one bloke previously got seriously attacked outside a Pub and left unconscious.
http://londonmuslims.blogspot.com/2011/07/drunk-racists-beaten-up-by-muslim.html
Islamophobia Backfires in Bolton
AN angry mob shouted racist abuse at the gates of an Islamic college, sparking a confrontation with Muslim students, a court heard.
A bottle and stones were thrown after the group of drunken teenagers goaded residents at the college, in Willows Lane, Deane, in March last year.
Two of the group climbed the gates to confront students but were beaten up and taken to hospital, Bolton Crown Court was told.
Niall Briercliffe, Barry Lomax, Aaron Buckley and Bhavesh Patel all admitted affray.
Patel, aged 19, of Brandon Street, Daubhill, was first to enter the college but after he threw missiles about five students rounded on him, leaving him unconscious with a suspected fractured skull.
Defending Patel, Peter Cunliffe said: “His comments were out of character and given his heritage, it makes it all the more strange and deplorable he said those words.”
Buckley, aged 18, of Canterbury Grove, Daubhill, told a doctor he had been attacked with a cricket bat and hit in the face with a brick.
Defending Buckley Nick Ross said: “His provocative behaviour was absolutely unjustified.”
Police investigated the two defendants’ injuries but no charges were brought.
Briercliffe and Lomax stayed behind the gates of the college with a group of others, who swore, shouted racist abuse and some threw stones.
The late-night standoff followed an earlier, unrelated assault at the Willows pub, involving Briercliffe, Lomax and Patel, who also admitted assault.
The court heard they beat up Lee Chadwick in the car park of the pub following a disagreement.
Mr Chadwick, who was in his early 20s and was known to the group, was left unconscious with cuts above his eye and to his lip.
Sentencing, Recorder Brian Cummings QC said: “You went into the grounds of the college, making confrontation almost inevitable.”
Patel was given a 10- month sentence suspended for two years and ordered to complete 100 hours unpaid work. He was ordered to pay £100 compensation.
Buckley was given a six-month sentence suspended for two years and ordered to complete 60 hours unpaid work. He was ordered to pay £100 costs.
Lomax, aged 18, of Horeb Street, Bolton, was given a 10-month sentence suspended for two years and ordered to complete 100 hours unpaid work. He was ordered to pay £100 compensation.
Briercliffe, aged 17, of Church Avenue, Daubhill, was given a 12-month youth rehabilitation order and ordered to complete 200 hours unpaid work.
http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/9143866.Racist_abuse_drunks_confronted_students/
Feedback: yahyasnow@hotmail.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
30 comments:
Speaking of drunks getting beaten by Muslims:
1) http://www.answeringmuslims.com/2011/07/convert-to-islam-receives-40-lashes-for.html
2) http://www.answeringmuslims.com/2011/07/bottoms-up-to-shariah.html
Oh Allah is most pleased. Two Kuffar had their skulls split open by Muslims, one of them a HINDU. If only one was a jew, then I'm sure there would be extra virgins.
It is good to see Muslims defending their relegion. I was begging to think that Muslims were like the Muslism on this blog to scared to even pick up a phone and call into ABN.
Yes these Muslims are truly Allahs helpers, defending the race of Muslims.
Come on Muslims stand up like these Muslims have, bash in the skulls of the Kuffar, any drunk englishman, Christian, Hindu or Jew, will do. If you cant find one then a Shia, a Ahamadian will suffice, to satiate allah's desire.
The virgins are waiting.
These two drunken Kuffar where no match for the brave Mujahadeen with cricket batts.
Thanks for posting this Snowman, now if you could only find the coruage to call into ABN.
@Radical Moderate
May Allah (swt) open your heart to the Truth, Insh'Allah.
RadMod: The virgins are waiting...I'm sure there would be extra virgins.
Being single must be getting to you. Let's just hope you don't follow the footsteps of Catholic priests and develop a "penchant" for young boys.
I'm suprised at this post of yours Yahya. Many people have died by much less aggression than this.
If the guy with a fractured skull had slipped into a coma and died even a year later are you aware that the assailant would be up for murder.
Things can get very serious very quickly in these situations.
why not...
Refuting said to RadMod: "Being single must be getting to you. Let's just hope you don't follow the footsteps of Catholic priests and develop a "penchant" for young boys."
....or young girls. After all, if you do that, the Muslims might start calling you a prophet.
I Thank the Lord Jesus that he did not leave us any example of pederasty. It is a shame that some Catholic priests have acted like Muhammadans.
RM, our frosty Irish Muslim friend calls it a telephone ;)
Anon: I Thank the Lord Jesus that he did not leave us any example of pederasty
Yet, those who attempt to emulate the so called Lord Jesus, as Catholics priests do, end up as pederasts.
@ the christian anonymous
you do realise not a week goes by with some EVANGELICAL raping or sexually assaulting girls and women?
its all the holy spirit.
Anon(Muslim) said: "Yet, those who attempt to emulate the so called Lord Jesus, as Catholics priests do, end up as pederasts."
You miss the whole point. Because Jesus left no such example of engaging in sexual acts with prepubescent boys and girls, it is not his example they "end up" following. If you want to play pin the tail on the donkey whom Satan made the picture perfect example of such behavior, it wouldn't be the Lord Jesus.
@ Ali,
That is patently false. Only a Muslim could be expected to make up and happily state an outrageous lie like that. Your father is a liar and the father of lies.
LOL anon is in denial.
here go to google, and type in 'pastor arrested' or 'pastor charged' then go on the news tab on the left hand side. see for yourself.
i post articles of evangelical pastors almost DAILY. please stop denying the truth, otherwise you'd be a peace loving muslim
A peace-loving Muslims is an oxymoron. It is like talking about Christian pederasts who should more appropriately be called functional Muslims.
I am afraid a google search does not produce the results you pretend. Sorry to burst your bubble. Care to try another argument?
Wow Snowman, you really got the wannabe Jihadi's worked up with this post. Maybe they will find their courage to call into ABN during Jesus or Mohamed.
Non Refuting
THe father has drawn me near, and placed me in the Sons hand, even if your Allah could which he can't, the Son will never let me go.
Tell me how is Allah to guide me when he only guides those that are rightly guided in the first place?
@Ali, what can be said. I guess there is good news, you will not be lonely.
Anon: You miss the whole point. Because Jesus left no such example of engaging in sexual acts with prepubescent boys and girls, it is not his example they "end up" following.
It still doesn't take away from the fact that these Catholic priests who dedicated themselves to the service of Christ ended up molesting children.
Jesus didn't marry. Following him (and his mother), nuns don't get married and neither do the male priests. What does that lead to? Homosexuality.
But there's even a bigger problem. These poor kids who got molested by the Lord's servants turned their abusers in.This is clearly against what Christ taught: DO NOT RESIST AN EVIL PERSON...If anyone FORCES you to go one mile, go with them two miles. (Matthew 5:38, 41)
Since an evil person cannot be resisted, the children had no right to resist the priests who wanted to molest them. Moreover, since verse 41 implies that if the abuser wanted to fondle his victim, the latter as a good Christian should allow him to "go all the way".
Thus, Christianity justifies child molestation. However, if Christianity sanctions child molestation, is it wrong to say that the priests who molest children are any less Holy Spirit possessed that Christians who secretly engage in homosexual prostitution like Ted Haggard or straight prostitution like Jimmy Swaggert?
What's taking the Christians so long to respond to my claim that Christianity justifies molestation?
If the above was intended as a joke, I guess it takes a Muslim to get it. In any event, as I will show, the joke is really on the above Muslim who had no shame in reasoning in the way that he did.
After I pointed out that professing Christians who engage in pederasty are functioning like Muslims, this bright Muslim unwittingly decided to show just how right I am.
Notice that the justification for pederasty given above is one that no Christian has ever arrived at through exegesis of the Scriptures. One must first put on his Muslim glasses in order to pervert the Scriptures in such a way. Ironically, not even the two Christians this person admires (i.e. Haggard and Swaggart) think the above ideas and passages underwrite their sin. Again, only our Muslim friend seems to be able to arrive at such ridiculous, Muhammadan conclusions.
And speaking of inferences, note the obvious non-sequitur: priests engage in homosexual acts with young boys because they are celibate.
Yet our Muslim friend's argument includes Jesus as someone who did not get married. Does he think Jesus was a homosexual? I probably shouldn't put it past this pervert, but I sure hope he is not that far gone.
As for his outlandish application of Matthew five, I will simply pretend for now that his perverted interpretation is true and show how he hung himself.
He points to Christ's words not to resist an evil person, and concludes from this that a child cannot resist a molester, in which case molestation is justified in Christianity. But note that this puts the molester in the "evil" category, in which case child molestation is not justified but condemned even by his own perverted handling of God's Word.
By the way, this was a bad example. It is atypical that any child, even one who is told to resist, can thwart the efforts of an adult seeking to do him harm.
In the end, I don't believe he even understands what Christ is saying. But as I showed, even looking at the text the way he suggests the conclusion he drew does not follow.
Any more jokes?
Christian ANON v's Muslim Anon.
Christian Anon wins with the nock out blow.
Another Muslim blinded by Islam bites the dust.
Anonymous: He points to Christ's words not to resist an evil person, and concludes from this that a child cannot resist a molester, in which case molestation is justified in Christianity. But note that this puts the molester in the "evil" category, in which case child molestation is not justified but condemned even by his own perverted handling of God's Word.
Yes, the molester is evil. But according to Christ, RESIST NO EVIL PERSON. Thus, if a rapist approaches a Christian woman, the latter should not resist him. If a Christian priest (aka person dedicated to the service of the Lord Christ) tries to fondle a youth, the latter cannot resist.
Not only can a Christian not resist an evil person, but he/she has to make things easier for the latter. Thus the woman who is confronted by a rapist will have to surrender herself to the rapist before he gets rough with her. Likewise, if the Christian priest wants to kiss the youth, the latter should allow him to do more than that.
I'll break it down for you. Matthew 5:38 clearly says NOT TO RESIST AN EVIL PERSON. The later verses say you should facilitate an evil person. Taken together, these verses can be used to justify evil, including rape and child molestation.
Anonymous: Ironically, not even the two Christians this person admires (i.e. Haggard and Swaggart) think the above ideas and passages underwrite their sin. Again, only our Muslim friend seems to be able to arrive at such ridiculous, Muhammadan conclusions.
And yet, Haggard and Swaggart would boast about how the Holy Spirit was working through them...before they got busted that is! Lol!
@Muslim Anon
Scrath head, huhhh?
The joke is still on the Muslim, apparently.
Aisha was a good Christian, then: she didn't resist Muhammad.
@THe Muslim Anon
THere is nothing worse then a Muslim projecting his perverted lusts on God's word.
But I guess that is to be expected.
Look I'm not calling you a pervert, just a Muslim. So please don't take offense.
Once again the Holy Spirit has left these Christian fools in the lurch. They can't refute my argument, so they resort to attacking Islam instead. Unfortunately for these dumb idiots, attacking Islam does not take away from the fact that "turning the other cheek" is tantamount to letting evil prevail.
@ christian anonymous,
are you technologically challenged? go to google, type in pastor arrested then click the news tab.
"They can't refute my argument, so they resort to attacking Islam instead. Unfortunately for these dumb idiots, attacking Islam does not take away from the fact that "turning the other cheek" is tantamount to letting evil prevail."
What argument? You made a baseless assertion. You seem to believe that "turn the other cheek" means never resist anyone for any reason and always comply. This simply does not follow, and you have not proven that it does. I know a little honest exegesis is far too much to ask from most Muslims...and you have yet again demonstrated that fact.
Anon: You seem to believe that "turn the other cheek" means never resist anyone for any reason and always comply. This simply does not follow
You are attacking straw man. I did not say "turn the other cheek" means not resisting "anyone for any reason and always comply". I said Matthew 5:38 says RESIST NO EVIL PERSON on the basis of which I argued that SPECIFICALLY a Christian woman cannot resist a rapist or a Christian boy cannot resist a molester because doing so would be tantamount to resist an evil person and as such against Jesus' teaching. What is the logical error I have committed?
Post a Comment