Monday, 8 July 2013

100% Proof Sam Shamoun is a Fool

I only have one question: why, oh why, do we waste our time with Sam Shamoun? It was time for Muslims to retire Sam Shamoun more than a decade ago. Sam Shamoun is an apologetics disaster, in this video we take evidences from his recent debate. Evidences for what? Evidences to show this man is a blithering FOOL.

Note, in this video the Bible is not referenced to mock the Christian or attack those related beliefs but to simply highlight the ignorance, foolishness and hypocrisy of the Christian 'apologist' Sam Shamoun. It's amazing this man has resorted to throwing his Bible behind his back and is now using atheistic arguments to attack Islam and Muslims. Such is his hatred of Muslims and Islam.

Fool Alert: Sam Shamoun Arguing Against Islam



If the video does not play, please see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUPJeuCazyc

Shamoun attacked the Muslim belief that Satan (a Jinn) has bowel movements and urinates. Shamoun attacks it as he believes it's 'irrtiaonal'. Yet the fool believes Satan can have sex with human women and impregnate them (thus according to his beliefs Satan produces sperm). This fool threw his Christian beliefs under the bus to simply use atheistic arguments against Islam. Such is his hatred for Islam that he is willing to disregard the Bible to attack Islam. FOOL!

Shamoun also attacks a hadith of a miracle of people hearing food glorifying Allah. Shamoun lies and claims the food was talking to Prophet Muhammad and praising him. However Shamoun's main contention is that he believes hearing food glorifying God is 'irrational' . Erm, this FOOL forgets according to the Bible Christians must believe in talking animals (donkey and serpent) and the FOOL forgets he also believes in other miracles according to the Bible such as Jesus walking on water, resurrections, changing water into wine etc.

So the FOOL simply shows himself to be indirectly insulting the accounts of miracles in the Bible whilst using atheistic arguments to attack Islam. Such is this man's hatred of Islam - he will throw his own Christian teachings under the bus at the whiff of an opportunity to attack Muslims and Islam. FOOL!

Learn about Islam:
http://www.thedeenshow.com/

Email: yahyasnow@yahoo.co.uk
at

24 comments:

  1. Radical Moderate8 July 2013 at 15:32

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Radical Moderate9 July 2013 at 00:29

    Poor Snowman is melting away. His Cabal of 1mm, TheGrandverbilizer, and all the others have all but left him. He is all alone on his blog making video's that no one watches, making more and more outrages claims and calls and debate challenges.

    If it wasn't for the comments of Christians that he promptly deletes he would have no comments at all.

    I say we leave him to his nocturnal Jinn Fighting.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous9 July 2013 at 01:54

    Shamoun pwnd himself.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous9 July 2013 at 09:12

    Hey Thank you Yahya Snow for all the free advertising of Sam Shamoun, David Wood, Answering Muslims, etc.

    When I read there articles and watched their videos I could see they really do a good job presenting the truth.

    Thank you once again. Please continue to provide the advertising. I hope many more people will be drawn to their articles, debates, and discussions.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous9 July 2013 at 17:47

    Hello Yahya. I was hoping to interact a little more with you on the matter of Muhammad going to Mecca as a fulfilment of Deuteronomy 33:2. I asked the question - Is Muhammad YHWH. You said no, Muhammad is not God he is only a prophet.

    Would this in itself not end the discussion then? I mean whatever you wish to say about the numbers of persons, if it is YHWH God that is being spoken of and not a a mere prophet (like Muhammad) then why even pursue the topic any further? I mean, this alone proves that Muhammad is not being prophesied in Deuteronomy 33:2. I would venture to say that to persist in saying it does refer to Muhammad would put you in danger of committing shirk, no?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous9 July 2013 at 20:22

    Sam shamoun stop hating Islam.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sam9 July 2013 at 23:13

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yahya Snow10 July 2013 at 03:07

    Yawn Sam

    We have already established you misled people by partially quoting AlTabari. See here:

    http://thefactsaboutislam.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/10000-or-12000-liberated-mecca-with.html

    I've shown you from Sahih alBukhari and the expertise of AlMubarakpuri that the number was in fact 10,000.

    The mere fact that you have tacitly admitted that you misued AlTabair (deceptively) shames you and your ilk enough but now you coma with a vague reference from elsewhere.

    YAWN

    Stop showing yourself up.

    YS

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yahya Snow10 July 2013 at 03:09

    PS Stop calling Musllims pagans, we follow Abrahamic monotheism. Abraham, Ishmael and Isaac were not pagans. They worshipped God alone just like all the Prophets including Jesus (pbut)

    Do you worship God alone? Or do you worship Jesus along with God?

    YS

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yahya Snow10 July 2013 at 05:06

    Sam, this whole saga is summarized in the link below. Thanks for kind of admitting you deceived people with your partial citation of Al-Tabari. That's a start.

    See here:

    http://thefactsaboutislam.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/answeringislamorg-tacit-admission-of.html


    PS stay on topic. The stuff off topic will be deleted.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Radical Moderate10 July 2013 at 05:13

    Snowman or should I now call you the "Snowblower"? Here is a quick video I made in response to your, I don't even know what to call your video or blog post. Since it was neither a response to the issue discussed in the debate nor was it response to the facts that your Islamic sources are conflicting and contradictory.

    I guess it was just an attack on your main obsession Sam Shamoun. Really man you need to get help with your fixation on Sam and David, its really creepy.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9ev91n_d5U

    ReplyDelete
  12. Yahya Snow10 July 2013 at 05:47

    Rad

    Boring. A waste of bandwidth

    Try comprehending what I say in the future.



    My video on Rogers being deceived by Shamoun is NOT my debate review.

    Get with the program.

    My review is due to be uploaded on the blog in WRITTEN. Just like the Abdallah -Shamoun review which you can read here:

    Please stop distorting and actually try comprehending what the other person is talking about.

    thefactsaboutislam.blogspot.co­.uk/2013/06/debate-was-muhamma­d-true-prophet-osama.html


    BTW the 'frightened' and 'scared' clips were quite witty. About the only interesting thing in that video:)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous10 July 2013 at 11:59

    Yahya,
    Could you please clear this matter up for me? I can see that there has been a lot of back and forth on the issue of the 10,000 who entered Mecca with Muhammad as an alleged fulfillment of Deuteronomy 33:2. My point has been quite simple all along. This passage is about YHWH. As you conceded, Muhammad is not YHWH. Therefore, why pursue the matter of 10,000 when the passage becomes irrelevant to prophetic prophecy about Muhammad?

    To claim that it is talking about Muhammad would lead to Shirk would it not? Since Muhammad is not YHWH God.

    Another question if you could clear it up for me is this...

    Is is possible that Muslims also engage in Shirk by assuming that a passage is Divine scripture when it might simply be just the words of men? Since Muslims state that the bible has been corrupted, how do you know that Deuteronomy 33:2 is not one of these corrupted passages? Just because it might contain some references to things that build up a picture in your mind to connect it to your prophet, is there not a danger in assuming it to be Divine prophecy when it could simply be a mis-connection on your part and resultingly Shirk for attributing Divine origin to the passage?

    If you could comment on these points I'd greatly appreciate it.

    Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Radical Moderate10 July 2013 at 12:21

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous10 July 2013 at 15:42

    Sam gt pwnd
    Dnt giv Sam more money

    ReplyDelete
  16. Yahya Snow10 July 2013 at 19:46

    @anon

    I do hope to upload a review of a couple of debates which include such Muslim argumentation concerning Deut33:2

    Feel free to post your q in that comment section, inshaAllah

    ReplyDelete
  17. Radical Moderate10 July 2013 at 20:09

    Yes Anon feel free to post your questions so Snowman can continue to ignore them or even delete your questions.

    Snowman Anon has been asking you questions which you continue to refuse to answer

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous10 July 2013 at 20:12

    Hi Yahya,

    Thank you for that. I'm just interested to know however, in light of what I've said. Would you agree that Deuteronomy 33:2 is definitely not about Muhammad since Muhammad is not YHWH? I will repost my questions into the new thread as it appears.

    Thank you for taking the time to respond.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous10 July 2013 at 21:27

    Yahya, do you know how long I will need to wait for such reviews to be posted up?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous11 July 2013 at 03:39

    Sam got pwnd

    ReplyDelete
  21. Yahya Snow11 July 2013 at 14:35

    @anon

    It was supposed to be completed this week but I'm struggling. I'd say Sunday at the earliest, not sure though

    ReplyDelete
  22. Yahya Snow11 July 2013 at 14:35

    @anon

    It was supposed to be completed this week but I'm struggling. I'd say Sunday at the earliest, not sure though

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous11 July 2013 at 15:42

    Thank you Yahya. I'm looking forward to it.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anonymous21 July 2013 at 14:03

    sam wud poo and piss in his trouser if yahya debated him. sham wud wear a diper to da debate. he luk funny. sam u faild again. u get pwnd always. u luk dummy again. sham dnt snap ur key bord

    ReplyDelete