If this video does not play, this video can also be found here
This is really odd. I only came across David's response to my work in countering their thighing hoax last
night after I was on my phone trying to search for one of my posts on a hoax
conversion via Google.
It's dated 2014, David Wood is having a testosterone-fuelled
blast at me. Playing the big man while trying to belittle the other guy.
Typical internet shenanigans. Sad.
OK, here's the serious bit, he's accusing me of
concealing evidence Prophet Muhammad 'thighed' Aisha. Erm, we've been through
this before. David claimed before Aisha moved in with Prophet Muhammad p, the
Prophet would 'thigh' her (intercrurual sex) because she was too young for
actual sex. The guy just made that up. See the video above. He was exposed on that a few years ago.
He never responded to it back then but all of a sudden we see this post which
really does not prove his case.
Firstly, a 'Fatwa' is not evidence for anything.
It just means opinion. To have evidence the Prophet did something you need a
narration (Hadith). A sound one at that. The local imam down the road can give fatwas on whether
it's permissibile to listen to music, use a fridge, wear Nike trainers or
whatever. It's a legal verdict. Not historical evidence about Prophet Muhammad
p.
I had a look at his link, I couldn't find the
narration the website was quoting. So, for the time being, I cannot delve into
the Arabic, if it the narration from Ibn Majah exists. However, notice the
"narration" does not mention Aisha and it does not mention anything
about pre-puberty. Quite how Wood thinks this validates his claims is beyond
me. It doesn't. Why wait all these years and produce something so insignificant
that doesn't even touch on the claims YOU made?
If I have time, I may look into all this further
and produce another blog post as that crowd seem to be trying to throw some
dust in the air to distract people from their unsubstantiated claims and
deceptions of the past. Sad.
Censorship
I am also being accused of censorship. These folk
have a screen shot of some comments that were deleted. I'm not sure if it's
from my blog but there's a discussion in the comments on his blog and it seems
like it's not just David who is accusing me of censorship (of links to this
thighing fatwa) so I guess some comments were deleted, unless David made a sock
account or two. I honestly don;t remember. As far as I recall, this is the
first time I've seen this post from David and this fatwa webiste which does not
prove anything. Perhaps I thought somebody was spamming. On newer posts I close off comments generally, they are time consuming, but the ancient posts on this blog have comments enabled so I assume, if what they must be referring to an older blog post. Whatever the case, I have no recollection of this. Clearly it was a big thing over at the AM blog :)
For anybody interested, David's post can be foundhere. All the stuff on his blog has been refuted. I always find it interesting
that he censors and then he makes a big deal out of me apparently censoring
(which I have no recollection of). Happy David? It's on my blog, now how about
you start allowing my comments and links on your blog, worried your donors will
follow Negeen Mayel through the exit door? BTW, your wife recently censored one of my vids in the Acts 17 group. Yep one of my vids was posted there and soon removed. What have you folk got to hide?
PS I found your belittlement odd considering at least
3 contributors of your blog (including yourself) have asked to debate me while your
buddy Shamoun regularly throws out debate challenges my way. Why debate a fly while
you boys are giants? Or is it really a case of you boys knowing this website and my
vids have harmed your credibility in the eyes of your supporters? Cutting through
all the childish insults, it's obvious that I'm not the fly he tries to paint me
as while David and his associates aren't the giants they style themselves as. More
humility and realism is required.
For the record, I challenge you to a debate. Any topic,
you can choose. As long as you agree to reciprocate and accept a topic from me.
We'll have the debate on YouTube. The place where falsehood and spin perishes :)
The place where so many have seen the Answering Muslims team stumble.
OK, I'm out. If anybody wants more history on the thighing stuff and more info on it, just search for the word on this blog and you will get a ton of posts on it. Have a good day. Peeeace.
For more refutations of David Wood, see:
http://thefactsaboutislam.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/David%20Wood
http://thefactsaboutislam.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/David%20Wood
If you're a supporter of Acts 17 or Answering Muslims, and want a private chat (perhaps you have concerns about some of their content and the way they do things) please email me: yahyasnow@yahoo.co.uk
No comments:
Post a Comment