Thursday, 8 August 2013

" I would NOT preach that text ( Mark 16:9-20 ) !! " says James White (Somebody call Samuel Green!)

Dr Von Tischendorf discovered the Codex Sinaiticus (from Saint Catherine’s monastery) in the 1800s, this codex does NOT contain the last 12 verses in the gospel of Mark (Mark 16:9-20) as well as John 7:53-8:11 amongst other discrepancies. These are believed to be forgeries. Sadder still, Christians, prior to this find believed those words to be faithful to the New Testament.

Here we see Dr James White admit he would not preach Mark 16:9-120. This must be confusing for Christians; 200 years ago Christians believed Mark 16:9-20 was the inspired word of God. Now they don't. Who knows, the possibility of another find tomorrow could well mean they admit another portion of the New Testament is a forgery.



The entire section from Mark 16:9 to the end is now WIDELY regarded as not part of the original gospel of Mark, because it's missing from two of the most important textual uncial witnesses, Sinaiticus and Vaticanus.

Additionally, there are other versions of the ending of Mark floating around there, suggesting that the scribes were baffled that Mark's gospel would end after verse 16:8


Bible scribes changed the NT:
http://thefactsaboutislam.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/bible-scribes-change-new-testament.html

Prophet Muhammad (p) and some miracles which were performed by the Will of God:
http://thefactsaboutislam.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/did-prophet-muhammad-p-perform-miracles.html

Watch a Muslim dominate a debate about whether Muhammad is in the Bible - Samuel Green and Zakir Hussain:
http://thefactsaboutislam.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/debate-review-muhammad-in-bible-zakir.html

Jesus taught people to do the Will of God (according to Mark 3:35) in order to become his brothers, mothers or sisters. A Muslim means one who submits to the Will of God. Do you want to become a brother of Jesus? If yes, become a Muslim. Now is the time.

Learn about Islam:
http://www.thedeenshow.com

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Secularism Debate with Terry Sanderson, President of the National Secularist Society (NSS)
By Abdullah al Andalusi • August 2, 2013
I would like to present a video featuring a debate between me and Terry Sanderson, President of the oldest and largest Secularist campaigning organisation in the UK, the National Secular Society (NSS).

The topic was to what degree should religion (or Secularism) influence the State?

It was an exciting debate, which touched upon the issue of Gay Marriage, the failure of Secularism to bring peace and stability in MOST countries where it has been tried, the false claim of Secular State neutrality, and the oppression of religious conscience both in the West, and around the world – and the superiority of the Islamic alternative that respects true pluralism, and diversity of religious conscience.

Shockingly, please notice in the debate how I get the Secularist to admit that you cannot have people being free to live according to their conscience!!

The only point he could say to back up his statement was, ‘what if a racist acted on his conscience and refused to act as a civil servant and marry mixed race couples? It was clearly a weak argument, considering that in the Secular state, there is imposed uniformity. In Islamic history, Jewish rabbis were allowed to refuse marrying a jewish woman to a Christian man. The couple would just go to the Christian area, and easily found a priest to get it done, with no problems, and no social strife. But in Secularism everyone must conform. Now racism is an extreme example he used, but I could counter against Secularists (and did during the debate) the REAL LIFE example of the Christian Registrar who was fired for their job in the UK, for refusing to be FORCED to marry a same-gender couple.

Anyways, I leave the rest of the arguments for you to see in the video. Inshallah please share with as many people as you can, this video contains some good textbook refutations of Secularism, and should be useful for intellectual refutations of the common irrational Secularist arguments.


http://thedebateinitiative.com/2013/08/02/secularism-debate-with-terry-sanderson-president-of-the-national-secularist-society-nss/

Anonymous said...

Secularism Debate with Terry Sanderson, President of the National Secularist Society (NSS)
By Abdullah al Andalusi • August 2, 2013
I would like to present a video featuring a debate between me and Terry Sanderson, President of the oldest and largest Secularist campaigning organisation in the UK, the National Secular Society (NSS).

The topic was to what degree should religion (or Secularism) influence the State?

It was an exciting debate, which touched upon the issue of Gay Marriage, the failure of Secularism to bring peace and stability in MOST countries where it has been tried, the false claim of Secular State neutrality, and the oppression of religious conscience both in the West, and around the world – and the superiority of the Islamic alternative that respects true pluralism, and diversity of religious conscience.

Shockingly, please notice in the debate how I get the Secularist to admit that you cannot have people being free to live according to their conscience!!

The only point he could say to back up his statement was, ‘what if a racist acted on his conscience and refused to act as a civil servant and marry mixed race couples? It was clearly a weak argument, considering that in the Secular state, there is imposed uniformity. In Islamic history, Jewish rabbis were allowed to refuse marrying a jewish woman to a Christian man. The couple would just go to the Christian area, and easily found a priest to get it done, with no problems, and no social strife. But in Secularism everyone must conform. Now racism is an extreme example he used, but I could counter against Secularists (and did during the debate) the REAL LIFE example of the Christian Registrar who was fired for their job in the UK, for refusing to be FORCED to marry a same-gender couple.

Anyways, I leave the rest of the arguments for you to see in the video. Inshallah please share with as many people as you can, this video contains some good textbook refutations of Secularism, and should be useful for intellectual refutations of the common irrational Secularist arguments.


http://thedebateinitiative.com/2013/08/02/secularism-debate-with-terry-sanderson-president-of-the-national-secularist-society-nss/

Sam Shamoun Debates said...

new debate site is here