I did communicate a message to you previously here:
Anthony you are hereby banned from commenting on this blog. You must improve your attitude before even attempting to comment again on this blog.
Your tirades are old, tired, boring and ridiculous.
Your latest comment is just evidence that you are not willing to use an ounce of comprehension and nor are you willing to dialogue in a reasoned and well-mannered fashion. Perhaps it's a sign of your inability to tackle the argumentation Muslims are putting forward.
Here's an example of your ability to throw out comprehension in order to attack people. Do you need a dictionary to differentiate between 'say' and 'seem'?
My comment to RadMod: Your analogy of Microsoft doesn't fit. Bassim Gorial actually preaches Christianity to non-Christians. Put this together with the teachings of 1 Peter 3:15 then one would expect a Christian to take this invitation seriously. What are you afraid of? You and Anthony don't seem to have confidence in Bassim.Don't you believe him to be a true Christian who follows 1 Peter 3:5?
Rogers: I didn't say anything about lacking confidence in Bassim. But you will delete this post and lievagain about what I said. That is why I will expose your deception in the next couple of days on Answering Muslims. I only lack confidence in YOU. If you read your post, you will see that you lack confidence in yourself as well. That is why you won't debate even Bassim but are issuing challenges for someone other than yourself to debate him. How sad.
Anthony please stop your championing of your buddies as though people are afraid to debate them. Most people have not heard of Sam and the rest of your buddies. This is the type of rebuke that your empty proclamations receive:
Paul Williams: Anthony Rogers, you really talk rubbish sometimes,
'You guys have shown repeatedly by your actions that you love to prey on the weak, but you run from the battle with your tails tucked between your legs when a real opponent is on the scene.'
On 21st February, representing MDI, I shared a platform at Cambridge University with the former Archbishop of Canterbury and head of the worldwide Anglican Communion, Lord Williams, to discuss 'Jesus in Islam and Christianity'. He was also a professor of Christian Theology at Oxford University.
I agree with Ijaz Ahmad who said on my blog yesterday:
'Sam Shamoun is desperate for a debate because no serious Muslim apologist would care to fall for his trap. He is frankly too immature and too infantile to hold a discussion without spewing insults from his tongue.
Br. Yahya, have Sam undergo psychiatric evaluation on his mental stability before even thinking about going into a debate with him. He cannot debate. Sam Shamoun needs someone to mock, insult and curse to magnify his bravado and to impress his herd.
Sam, if you really want someone to debate, why not debate a Christian academic on Textual Criticism, or Soteriology, rather than fight Muslims when we use your own scholarship against you? The truth is, Christian scholars are embarrassed by you, Muslim da’ees rather debate educated people and the lay people are tired of your rancor and petulant behaviour.'
Oh and please quit bemoaning the fact some of your silly and insulting comments have been deleted. Your boss (Dave) blocks people for simply refuting him. Numerous people have experienced this.
Anthony, please stop.
You are banned from this blog. Please do not comment on this blog until you have re-evaluated your approach for the better. I call you to less testosterone, calm, sincerity and comprehension,
'Ijaz Ahmed Exposed' Nonsense.
I am not too sure if you (Rogers) and/or your buddies are responsible for that nonsense. Please don't post any links to that tacky nonsense again. I have respect and love for my Muslim brother, Ijaz Ahmed, and I shall not accept those links again.
As for the material on that site, in the comment section on this blog Ijaz confirmed it has nothing to do with him. In any case, that grainy image which contains a testimony of somebody would have been put on the net by somebody with sincere intentions about a SERIOUS and sensitive subject. What do you fundy Christians do upon struggling to argue with Calling Christians on theological matters? You make some ridiculous blog post based on somebody's childhood abuse testimony and desperately try to link it to Ijaz.
Is there any wonder folk don't take you and your leaders seriously? You guys continually supply us with crazy antics to rebuke or just sigh at.
I guess this website is driving some folk crazy:
Oh and it seems to have a section dealing with the banned Anthony Rogers:
Please also be sure to have a gander at the Sam Shamoun and David Wood sections on that site. I guess some of the rabble that support those guys aren't too happy with Ijaz.
Learn about Islam: http://www.whyislam.org/